Click here to return Home.
Home
Calendar
The Association
The Neighborhood
The Back Yard:
- Issues that
Affect Us
Letters and Opinions
- The Lighter Side
- Instant Poll
Links & Resources
NENA Review
Photo Gallery
Contact NENA

Phone: 612-724-5652,  Fax: 612-724-2770

 

Nokomis East Neighborhood Association
About NENA, its projects & programs, task forces, volunteers, mission, and staff. Living, shopping, and working in the four Nokomis East Neighborhoods. Issues and opinions, letters, humor, message boards, and related pieces. Useful links and contacts.
Letters and Opinions
 


|  Hwy 55: Previous 1  2  3   |  Index  | 



Highway 55 Speed Limit  (Page 3)


(11/14/02)

At least 50 mph!

I strongly believe that the Highway 55 Speed Limit should be at least 50 m.p.h. This is a major trafficway into downtown Minneapolis and is not a residential street.

Traffic congestion in the metropolitan area is getting worse and restricting speed on 55 does not make any sense. I have read the October 7, 2002 letter from Carol Kummer (Chair of the Light Rail) to the Minnesota Department of Transportation and was appalled.

The Highway 55 corridor will never be a pedestrian friendly area. Why would someone want to walk along a train track and highway? I love to walk but prefer scenic areas.

Speed bumps at Hwy 55 intersections would be insane.

I vote in every election and try to learn about the issues, but I just found out about the above situation. I strongly support increasing the speed limit to at least 50 m.p.h.
- Karla K. Wagner
Nokomis Resident

Top of page



(11/14/02)

Leave it at 35

The letter from Carol Kummer to the MnDOT is excellent and reflects the sentiments of many Longfellow neighborhood residents. [See the letter]

A few additional comments to NENA's argument:
1. Increased traffic speeds mean more noise. Increased speed limits will syphon more traffic off of the interstates, which means even more noise. Our neighborhoods bear a significant burden of noise from the MSP Airport. For livability, maintaining property values, and attracting development, we need less noise, not more.

2. Increased traffic speeds mean more air pollution. A growing body of studies points to auto and truck exhaust as a significant source of cardiopulmonary ailments, as well as increased cancer risks. These health problems are borne by all of us, but especially by children and the elderly. [Diesel truck exhaust dwarfs the impact gasoline engine exhaust. And undoubtedly, it is business and trucking interests that are lobbying MnDOT for speed increases on 55].

3. Instead of longer walk times at the traffic signals, I would argue for structural changes in the road and curbs that make the distance pedestrians need to walk SHORTER. Combine this with shorter red/green cycle times -- in traditional urban areas, pedestrians and bicyclists never need to wait long for a light to change. Shorter cycles would also temper traffic speeds and dissuade drivers from leaving the interstate.

- Paul Andre, Longfellow Community Environment and Transportation Committee member

[Webmaster's note: Mr. Andre refers to "NENA's argument," above. It should be noted that NENA is simply hosting this discussion for the benefit of all neighborhood residents.]

Top of page



(11/14/02)

Keep it at 35

Dear neighbors and MnDOT,

I am absolutely opposed to raising the speed limits along Hwy 55. During the open meetings and discussions held a few years back regarding the reroute, our elected officials and representatives from MnDOT continually threw the phrase at us, "this will not be a freeway, the speed limit will be 35 mph, don't worry." When any of us opposing the reroute countered that claim, saying people would go faster anyway, they countered with reassurances that the speed limit of 35 mph would be enforced and held.

The road is not even finished yet and these same elected officials and MnDOT representatives are already backpedaling on their promises. I and many of my neighbors DO NOT want a freeway with speeds in excess of 35mph in our neighborhood!!!!!
- Sue Cairn

Top of page



(11/12/02)

At least 45 MPH

Like it or not, many of us believe Hiawatha can and should sets its speed limits safely at 45 MPH through most if not all of its course in Minneapolis. I'd even support an unspoken, "It's okay to go 55 when conditions are good, but you will get stopped at 56MPH."

With the advent of light rail, this will become a multi-modal corridor. The nature of the parallel right-of-ways presents additional hazards to any who attempt to cross them or enter or exit via the roadway or rail. Pedestrians, bicyclists, and automobiles will all need to pay attention to safety as they cross or access the highway. A uniform increase in the speed limit to 45+, would not significantly raise the level of risk at any authorized intersection.

The roadway clearly can support the faster speed, and frequently does so even with the already posted limits.

One of the benefits of living in our neighborhood, is the speed with which we can get out and about when we want. Quick access to virtually any point in the metro area makes living in the center of the metro worthwhile for many. A quick Hiawatha lends value to those of us who live here. It's not a little thing to trim a few minutes here or there in our busy days. A quick jaunt to downtown or Lake street is not without its merits. A quicker trip does increase traffic demand as it reduces drive time for a broader traffic shed. More people will want to drive on 55 from further away if the speed limit is 45 than will if it is 35.

Some may see less traffic on a slower street as a benefit. Others will see it as an unnecessary obstruction to traffic flow in a metro-wide system that is beginning to show volume strains. Some slow-street proponents may argue against the outsiders, the dreaded evil suburbanites, "Let's keep the speed limit low and slow to discourage them from driving though our neighborhoods." Fast-street people will argue the overview, the regional perspective, "We are the world, we are the metro."

We have infrastructure systems based on logic rather than political whim. However, political whim as reflected by my driving behavior and that of many of my friends and fellow drivers supports a speed limit of 45. At least that's the vote as recorded on many of our speedometers. 35 feels too slow. I suspect that the clear choice of those who actually use the road on a daily basis would be for a 45-55 MPH range.

Some, who may not use the roadway frequently, may not fully appreciate it's value to those who do. Just as we can appreciate and value speed in our computer browsers, we should appreciate the value of speed in communications when expressed in a different medium.

Traffic flow is, in fact, the lifeblood of our society. It is a direct manifestation of our social and cultural interaction as a society. Restricting the blood flow in an artery could lead to a brain hemorrhage, or other dire consequence. Keeping the flow free signifies a healthier system.

The NENA neighborhood's fantastic new web site has started an ongoing discussion of the Highway 55 speed issue in its "Backyard" section. Great website, check it out at http://www.nokomiseast.org
- Earl Netwal
  Near downtown Nokomis Village,
  somewhere in the urban forest,
  within walking range of 55

Top of page



(11/12/02)